6.1 引言 85-86
6.2 四种双亲分子团簇判据的比较 86-91
6.2.1 模拟方法介绍 86
6.2.2 结果和讨论 86-91
6.3 四种团簇法则的总结和评估 91-93
第七章 总结和展望 93-97
7.1 内容提要 93-94
7.2 论文结论 94-96
7.3 工作展望 96-97
参考文献 97-107
六、本文研究进展(略)
七、目前已经阅读的主要文献
1. Li, D.; Kaner, R. B., Shape and Aggregation Control of Nanoparticles: NotShaken, Not Stirred. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 968.
2. Patzke, G. R.; Zhou, Y.; Kontic, R.; Conrad, F., Oxide Nanomaterials: SyntheticDevelopments, Mechanistic Studies, and Technological Innovations. Angew. Chem.Int. Ed. Engl. 2011, 50, 826.
3. Das, P.; King, J. A.; Zhou, R., Aggregation of Γ-Crystallins Associated withHuman Cataracts Via Domain Swapping at the C-Terminal Β-Strands. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 10514.
4. Porter, A. E.; Gass, M.; Muller, K.; Skepper, J. N.; Midgley, P. A.; Welland, M.,Direct Imaging of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Cells. Nat. Nanotech. 2007, 2,713.
5. Liu, S.; Wei, L.; Hao, L.; Fang, N.; Chang, M. W.; Xu, R.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.,Sharper and Faster “Nano Darts” Kill More Bacteria: A Study of AntibacterialActivity of Individually Dispersed Pristine Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube. ACSNano 2009, 3, 3891.
6. Bhattacharjee, J. K.; Kaatze, U., Fluctuations near the Critical MicelleConcentration. II. Ultrasonic Attenuation Spectra and Scaling. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013,117, 3798.
7. Whitesides, G. M.; Grzybowski, B., Self-Assembly at All Scales. Science 2002,295, 2418.
8. Srinivas, G.; Klein, M. L., Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Self-Assemblyand Nanotube Formation by Amphiphilic Molecules in Aqueous Solution: ACoarse-Grain Approach. Nanotech. 2007, 18, 205703.
9. Wickner, W., Assembly of Proteins into Membranes. Science (New York) 1980,210, 861.
10. Sterpone, F.; Briganti, G.; Pierleoni, C., Sphere Versus Cylinder: The Effect ofPacking on the Structure of Nonionic C12e6 Micelles. Langmuir 2009, 25, 8960.
11. Daful, A. G.; Avalos, J. B.; Mackie, A. D., Model Shape Transitions of Micelles:Spheres to Cylinders and Disks. Langmuir 2012, 28, 3730.
12. Chandler, D., Interfaces and the Driving Force of Hydrophobic Assembly. Nature2005, 437, 640.
13. Hargreaves, R.; Bowron, D. T.; Edler, K., Atomistic Structure of a Micelle inSolution Determined by Wide Q-Range Neutron Diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,133, 16524.
14. de Aguiar, H. B.; de Beer, A. G. F.; Strader, M. L.; Roke, S., The InterfacialTension of Nanoscopic Oil Droplets in Water Is Hardly Affected by Sds Surfactant. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2122.
15. Jusufi, A.; LeBard, D. N.; Levine, B. G.; Klein, M. L., Surfactant ConcentrationEffects on Micellar Properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 987.
16. Chandler, D., Physical Chemistry - Oil on Troubled Waters. Nature 2007, 445,831.
17. Lin, J.-Q.; Zhang, H.-W.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, Y.-G.; Zhang, Z.-Q.; Ye, H.-F.,Simulation Study of Aggregations of Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles inSolvents. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 18991.
18. Li, T. I.; Sknepnek, R.; Macfarlane, R. J.; Mirkin, C. A.; Olvera de la Cruz, M.,Modeling the Crystallization of Spherical Nucleic Acid Nanoparticle Conjugates withMolecular Dynamics Simulations. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 2509.
19. Goetz, R.; Lipowsky, R., Computer Simulations of Bilayer Membranes:Self-Assembly and Interfacial Tension. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 7397.
20. Cardinaux, F.; Zaccarelli, E.; Stradner, A.; Bucciarelli, S.; Farago, B.; Egelhaaf, S.U.; Sciortino, F.; Schurtenberger, P., Cluster-Driven Dynamical Arrest inConcentrated Lysozyme Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 7227.
21. Mahmoudi, M.; Lynch, I.; Ejtehadi, M. R.; Monopoli, M. P.; Bombelli, F. B.;Laurent, S., Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions: Opportunities and Challenges. Chem.Rev. 2011, 111, 5610.
22. Capito, R. M.; Azevedo, H. S.; Velichko, Y. S.; Mata, A.; Stupp, S. I.,Self-Assembly of Large and Small Molecules into Hierarchically Ordered Sacs andMembranes. Science 2008, 319, 1812.
23. Wong, G. C. L., Hierarchical Self-Assembly of F-Actin and Cationic LipidComplexes: Stacked Three-Layer Tubule Networks. Science 2000, 288, 2035.
24. Giovambattista, N.; Lopez, C. F.; Rossky, P. J.; Debenedetti, P. G.,Hydrophobicity of Protein Surfaces: Separating Geometry from Chemistry. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 2274.
25. Mittal, J.; Best, R. B., Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Protein Folding underConfinement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 20233.
26. Lucent, D.; Vishal, V.; Pande, V. S., Protein Folding under Confinement: A Rolefor Solvent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 10430.
27. Giovambattista, N.; Rossky, P.; Debenedetti, P., Phase Transitions Induced byNanoconfinement in Liquid Water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 050603.
28. Zhang, S. Q.; Cheung, M. S., Manipulating Biopolymer Dynamics byAnisotropic Nanoconfinement. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 3438.
29. Desarnaud, J.; Derluyn, H.; Carmeliet, J.; Bonn, D.; Shahidzadeh, N.,Metastability Limit for the Nucleation of Nacl Crystals in Confinement. J. Phys.Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 890.
30. Arai, N.; Yasuoka, K.; Zeng, X., Self-Assembly of Surfactants and PolymorphicTransition in Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7916.